logo

Follow/Share
  • About
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Diversity
  • Alumni
  • English
    • 普通話

Stephen A. Miller

Member

Philadelphia
1900 Market Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
P
(215) 665-4736
TF
(800) 523-2900
F
(215) 665-2013
  • People
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • U
    • V
    • W
    • X
    • Y
    • Z
    • |
    • View all people



  • Industries
    • Energy & Utilities
    • Food & Beverage
    • Gaming
    • Health Care & Life Sciences
    • Insurance
    • Media, Entertainment & Sports
    • Real Estate & Construction
    • Technology
    • Transportation & Logistics
    • Venture Capital
  • Practice Areas
      • Antitrust & Trade Regulation
      • Bankruptcy, Insolvency & Restructuring
      • China Practice
      • Corporate
      • Emerging Business & Venture Capital
      • Energy, Environmental & Public Utilities
      • Health Care
      • International
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Private Client Services
      • Public & Project Finance
      • Securities
      • Tax
      • Transportation & Logistics
      Business/Corporate
      • Antitrust & Trade Regulation
      • Aviation
      • Consumer Protection & Privacy
      • Cozen O'Connor Public Strategies - Government Relations
      • Energy, Environmental & Public Utilities
      • Health Care
      • Privacy & Data Security
      • Transportation & Logistics
      Government & Regulatory
      • Bad Faith
      • Cyber/Technology
      • Insurance Corporate & Regulatory
      • Insurance Coverage & Claims Litigation
      • Professional Liability Insurance Coverage
      • Reinsurance
      • Subrogation & Recovery
      Insurance
      • Biologics/Biosimilars
      • Domains
      • e-commerce
      • Entertainment Law
      • Franchising
      • Hatch-Waxman Litigation
      • Intellectual Property Litigation
      • Licensing & Transfer
      • Patents
      • Right of Privacy & Right of Publicity
      • Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition
      • Trademark & Copyright
      Intellectual Property
      • Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
      • Employment Litigation
      • Immigration
      • Labor Relations & Disputes
      • Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition
      Labor & Employment
      • Antitrust Litigation & Investigations
      • Appellate
      • Aviation
      • Bankruptcy, Insolvency & Restructuring
      • Complex Litigation
      • Construction
      • Cyber/Technology
      • Electronic Discovery
      • Energy, Environmental & Public Utilities
      • Family Law
      • Franchise Disputes
      • Health Care
      • Insurance Coverage & Claims Litigation
      • Intellectual Property Litigation
      • Internal Investigations & Criminal Defense
      • Products Liability
      • Professional Liability
      • Real Estate Litigation
      • Securities Litigation & Enforcement
      • Self-insured Recovery
      • Transportation & Logistics Litigation
      Litigation
      • Brownfields Development
      • Distressed Real Estate
      • Eminent Domain
      • Office/Retail/Industrial Leasing & Development
      • Real Estate Finance
      • Real Estate Litigation
      • Zoning, Land Use & Development
      Real Estate
      • Subrogation & Recovery
    • Experience
      • Client Stories
      • Experience
    • Offices
      • Atlanta
      • New York
      • Charlotte
      • Philadelphia
      • Cherry Hill
      • San Diego
      • Chicago
      • Seattle
      • Dallas
      • Toronto
      • Denver
      • Washington, D.C.
      • Harrisburg
      • West Conshohocken
      • Houston
      • West Palm Beach
      • London
      • Wilkes-Barre
      • Los Angeles
      • Wilmington
      • Miami
    • News & Resources
      • Blogs
      • News & Resources
      • Media Resources
      • Publications
    • OVERVIEW
    • EXPERIENCE
    • ADDITIONAL PRACTICES
    • NEWS
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • EVENTS

    Stephen A. Miller

    Stephen A. Miller is a member of Cozen O’Connor’s Commercial Litigation Group in Philadelphia. Stephen draws on his notable litigation experience to assist companies and individuals facing potential criminal exposure. Prior to joining the firm in September 2010, Stephen served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of the United States, practiced appellate law at Mayer Brown in Chicago, and worked for nine years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices in the Southern District of New York and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. As a prosecutor, he conducted dozens of high-profile investigations and trials.

    Stephen’s practice focuses primarily on helping companies and individuals navigate government investigations, implement compliance programs, and defend against criminal charges. He has represented a diverse range of clients, including large health care service providers, financial institutions, transportation companies, manufacturers, software makers, universities, college and professional athletes, and corporate directors and executives.

    He has particular experience in the areas of international anti-corruption laws and export controls. Stephen designs anti-bribery and export-control compliance programs for clients, and counsels clients about investigations into potential violations of those laws. As a federal prosecutor, Stephen conducted and supervised far-reaching investigations into violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and federal export regulations. Among other successes, Stephen investigated and prosecuted individuals who exported sensitive technology to Iran in violation of export controls, uncovered and prosecuted widespread fraud in the United Nations’s Oil-for-Food Program, and thwarted efforts by Hezbollah to obtain thousands of heat-seeking missiles and machine guns. He received the Attorney General’s Distinguished Service Award in 2008.

    In addition to his trial and investigative credentials, Stephen has exceptional abilities as an appellate lawyer. After law school, he served as a law clerk for both the Honorable Joel M. Flaum of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit and Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United States. As a practicing attorney, Stephen has briefed and argued appeals before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 7th, and Federal Circuits, as well as briefed matters in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of the United States.

    Finally, due to Stephen’s unique experience spearheading numerous jury trials, he occasionally assists with major civil litigation. He has represented corporate clients and individuals in civil lawsuits involving a diverse array of claims, including False Claims Act violations, investment agreement violations, federal forfeiture proceedings, and constitutional challenges to proposed government policies.

    Stephen graduated summa cum laude from both Princeton University and Northwestern University School of Law. At Princeton, he majored in Near Eastern studies. Stephen attended Northwestern on a full-tuition scholarship and graduated first in his class while serving on the editorial board of the Northwestern Law Review. 

     

     

    Experience

    Internal Investigations

    • Conducted internal investigation for large health-care services provider into potential Stark Act violations.
    • Conducted internal investigation for manufacturing company into allegations of theft and embezzlement; discovered perpetrator, obtained full confession, and turned over results of investigation to law enforcement officials, who obtained a guilty plea from the perpetrator.
    • Conducted internal investigation for a publicly traded bank into allegations of mismanagement.
    • Conducted internal investigation for national services company regarding billing practices and mismanagement of company's resources by local agents.
    • Conducted internal investigation for publicly traded company regarding benefits provided to federal government officials.
    • Conducted internal investigation for The Wine Advocate, a pre-eminent publisher of wine ratings and criticism, into allegations of impropriety by former associates.

    Criminal Defense

    • Represented medical practice in self-reporting Stark Act violations to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; negotiated fine of less-than-1% of affected billings and no criminal charges or civil actions filed against client.
    • Represented individual in federal prosecution of interstate gambling, tax fraud, and money laundering; no charges filed against client.
    • Represented Internet poker website in federal prosecution of interstate gambling and money laundering; no criminal charges filed against client.
    • Represented transportation company in criminal investigation relating to importation of parts from Europe; no charges filed against client and obtained a declination letter from U.S. Attorney’s office.
    • Represented witness in state prosecutions relating to Penn State sexual abuse scandals; no charges filed against client.
    • Represented executive of payment processing company who pleaded guilty to operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business servicing Internet gambling businesses; obtained for client a sentence of 36 months imprisonment where Court found that the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range was 108-135 months imprisonment.
    • Represented individual in federal prosecution for health-care fraud in Southern District of Texas; trial scheduled for March 2013.
    • Represented two different, former directors of banks in FDIC investigations into boards’ oversight of loan practices; no criminal charges or civil lawsuits filed against either client.
    • Represented health-care system in SEC investigation relating to municipal bonds issued by the system; no criminal charges or civil enforcement actions filed against client.

    Foreign Corrupt Practices Act & Export Controls

    • Designed anti-bribery compliance program — including training for key employees — for prominent fitness company preparing to market its exercise videos and accessories internationally.
    • Counseled former executive of publicly traded company in internal investigation relating to potential FCPA violations in Latin America.
    • Counseled publicly traded software company about application of U.S. trade sanctions and export-control laws on proposed international transactions, including advice on due diligence of potential partners and licensees.
    • Counseled manufacturing company on application of Arms Export Control Act to its international sales; successfully obtained ruling that client did not need to register with and obtain licenses for all sales from Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.

    Civil Litigation

    • Represented the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in convincing federal and state courts to reject efforts by the City of Harrisburg to declare bankruptcy.
    • Represented corporate executive in civil lawsuit brought under the False Claims Act regarding health-care services company’s alleged billing practices and violations of Anti-Kickback Statute.
    • Represented investment management company in federal civil action to recover millions of dollars owed as a result of material defaults in investment agreement.
    • Represented Internet poker website in federal civil forfeiture proceedings.
    • Represented investors in federal civil action against auditors alleging complicity in fraud by Adelphia Communications, which led to the loss of millions of the investors’ dollars.
    • Represented investor in federal civil action against executive of prominent hedge fund based on the executive’s failure to honor agreement regarding distribution of millions of dollars of profits.
    • Counseled mining company on constitutional challenges to proposed tax policies that might have bankrupted the company;
    • Represented company in negotiating favorable resolution of civil claims against major airline relating to failure to pay fair price for services provided at several airports.
    • Worked with Cozen team representing a coalition of insurance companies in a federal civil action against The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, various Saudi charities, and other alleged supporters of Al Qaeda for over two billion dollars of damages resulting from property and casualty payments occasioned by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
    • Counseled hedge fund on litigation and regulatory issues, including requirements of registered investment advisors and potential libel/slander claims

    Other

    • Represented supplier of hundreds of millions of dollars of goods to U.S. military bases in Afghanistan in debarment proceedings based on alleged fraud; successfully convinced U.S. Army to reject proposed debarment.
    • Represented NCAA football player from BCS Conference in appeal of student-athlete’s eligibility.
    • Conducted audit of prominent university’s interactions with minors and recommended new, multi-disciplinary policies and procedures to govern those interactions to minimize risks of abuse, as well as developed engaging training materials to teach personnel about mandatory reporting obligations and how to spot and prevent child abuse.
    • Represented witness in testimony before the federal House Committee on Ethics.

     

    Additional Practices

    Stephen A. Miller is a member of Cozen O’Connor’s Commercial Litigation Group in Philadelphia. Stephen draws on his notable litigation experience to assist companies and individuals facing potential criminal exposure. Prior to joining the firm in September 2010, Stephen served as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of the United States, practiced appellate law at Mayer Brown in Chicago, and worked for nine years as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices in the Southern District of New York and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. As a prosecutor, he conducted dozens of high-profile investigations and trials.

    Stephen’s practice focuses primarily on helping companies and individuals navigate government investigations, implement compliance programs, and defend against criminal charges. He has represented a diverse range of clients, including large health care service providers, financial institutions, transportation companies, manufacturers, software makers, universities, college and professional athletes, and corporate directors and executives.

    He has particular experience in the areas of international anti-corruption laws and export controls. Stephen designs anti-bribery and export-control compliance programs for clients, and counsels clients about investigations into potential violations of those laws. As a federal prosecutor, Stephen conducted and supervised far-reaching investigations into violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and federal export regulations. Among other successes, Stephen investigated and prosecuted individuals who exported sensitive technology to Iran in violation of export controls, uncovered and prosecuted widespread fraud in the United Nations’s Oil-for-Food Program, and thwarted efforts by Hezbollah to obtain thousands of heat-seeking missiles and machine guns. He received the Attorney General’s Distinguished Service Award in 2008.

    In addition to his trial and investigative credentials, Stephen has exceptional abilities as an appellate lawyer. After law school, he served as a law clerk for both the Honorable Joel M. Flaum of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit and Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United States. As a practicing attorney, Stephen has briefed and argued appeals before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 7th, and Federal Circuits, as well as briefed matters in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of the United States.

    Finally, due to Stephen’s unique experience spearheading numerous jury trials, he occasionally assists with major civil litigation. He has represented corporate clients and individuals in civil lawsuits involving a diverse array of claims, including False Claims Act violations, investment agreement violations, federal forfeiture proceedings, and constitutional challenges to proposed government policies.

    Stephen graduated summa cum laude from both Princeton University and Northwestern University School of Law. At Princeton, he majored in Near Eastern studies. Stephen attended Northwestern on a full-tuition scholarship and graduated first in his class while serving on the editorial board of the Northwestern Law Review. 

    Experience

    Internal Investigations

    • Conducted internal investigation for large health-care services provider into potential Stark Act violations.
    • Conducted internal investigation for manufacturing company into allegations of theft and embezzlement; discovered perpetrator, obtained full confession, and turned over results of investigation to law enforcement officials, who obtained a guilty plea from the perpetrator.
    • Conducted internal investigation for a publicly traded bank into allegations of mismanagement.
    • Conducted internal investigation for national services company regarding billing practices and mismanagement of company's resources by local agents.
    • Conducted internal investigation for publicly traded company regarding benefits provided to federal government officials.
    • Conducted internal investigation for The Wine Advocate, a pre-eminent publisher of wine ratings and criticism, into allegations of impropriety by former associates.

    Criminal Defense

    • Represented medical practice in self-reporting Stark Act violations to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; negotiated fine of less-than-1% of affected billings and no criminal charges or civil actions filed against client.
    • Represented individual in federal prosecution of interstate gambling, tax fraud, and money laundering; no charges filed against client.
    • Represented Internet poker website in federal prosecution of interstate gambling and money laundering; no criminal charges filed against client.
    • Represented transportation company in criminal investigation relating to importation of parts from Europe; no charges filed against client and obtained a declination letter from U.S. Attorney’s office.
    • Represented witness in state prosecutions relating to Penn State sexual abuse scandals; no charges filed against client.
    • Represented executive of payment processing company who pleaded guilty to operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business servicing Internet gambling businesses; obtained for client a sentence of 36 months imprisonment where Court found that the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range was 108-135 months imprisonment.
    • Represented individual in federal prosecution for health-care fraud in Southern District of Texas; trial scheduled for March 2013.
    • Represented two different, former directors of banks in FDIC investigations into boards’ oversight of loan practices; no criminal charges or civil lawsuits filed against either client.
    • Represented health-care system in SEC investigation relating to municipal bonds issued by the system; no criminal charges or civil enforcement actions filed against client.

    Foreign Corrupt Practices Act & Export Controls

    • Designed anti-bribery compliance program — including training for key employees — for prominent fitness company preparing to market its exercise videos and accessories internationally.
    • Counseled former executive of publicly traded company in internal investigation relating to potential FCPA violations in Latin America.
    • Counseled publicly traded software company about application of U.S. trade sanctions and export-control laws on proposed international transactions, including advice on due diligence of potential partners and licensees.
    • Counseled manufacturing company on application of Arms Export Control Act to its international sales; successfully obtained ruling that client did not need to register with and obtain licenses for all sales from Directorate of Defense Trade Controls.

    Civil Litigation

    • Represented the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in convincing federal and state courts to reject efforts by the City of Harrisburg to declare bankruptcy.
    • Represented corporate executive in civil lawsuit brought under the False Claims Act regarding health-care services company’s alleged billing practices and violations of Anti-Kickback Statute.
    • Represented investment management company in federal civil action to recover millions of dollars owed as a result of material defaults in investment agreement.
    • Represented Internet poker website in federal civil forfeiture proceedings.
    • Represented investors in federal civil action against auditors alleging complicity in fraud by Adelphia Communications, which led to the loss of millions of the investors’ dollars.
    • Represented investor in federal civil action against executive of prominent hedge fund based on the executive’s failure to honor agreement regarding distribution of millions of dollars of profits.
    • Counseled mining company on constitutional challenges to proposed tax policies that might have bankrupted the company;
    • Represented company in negotiating favorable resolution of civil claims against major airline relating to failure to pay fair price for services provided at several airports.
    • Worked with Cozen team representing a coalition of insurance companies in a federal civil action against The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, various Saudi charities, and other alleged supporters of Al Qaeda for over two billion dollars of damages resulting from property and casualty payments occasioned by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
    • Counseled hedge fund on litigation and regulatory issues, including requirements of registered investment advisors and potential libel/slander claims

    Other

    • Represented supplier of hundreds of millions of dollars of goods to U.S. military bases in Afghanistan in debarment proceedings based on alleged fraud; successfully convinced U.S. Army to reject proposed debarment.
    • Represented NCAA football player from BCS Conference in appeal of student-athlete’s eligibility.
    • Conducted audit of prominent university’s interactions with minors and recommended new, multi-disciplinary policies and procedures to govern those interactions to minimize risks of abuse, as well as developed engaging training materials to teach personnel about mandatory reporting obligations and how to spot and prevent child abuse.
    • Represented witness in testimony before the federal House Committee on Ethics.

    News


    U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Genesis Healthcare Corporation

    April 17, 2013

    In Genesis Healthcare Corp v. Laura Symczyk, the Court ruled that the case against the nursing and rehabilitation provider should be dismissed because its offer to Symczyk of the unpaid wages to which she alleged she was entitled effectively ended her stake in the case. The 5-4 decision, split along the court's ideological fault lines, will likely have limited practical applicability but could spark further debate about whether the justices treat collective actions brought under the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) differently from traditional class actions

    MORE


    Stephen Miller Quoted in Bloomberg Businessweek

    December 19, 2012

    In an article titled, “SAC Indictment Deadline May Show U.S. Hand on Cohen Deal,” Stephen Miller, a former federal prosecutor, discussed the government’s approach to securing an indictment against a former SAC Capital Advisors LP portfolio manager accused of insider trading.

    MORE


    Stephen Miller’s Representation of Genesis Healthcare Corporation Mentioned in Law 360

    December 03, 2012

    Genesis Healthcare Corporation urged the U.S. Supreme Court to refuse to allow wage-and-hour collective actions to proceed after the named plaintiff has been offered full relief, contending that such an offer moots the case.

    MORE


    Stephen Miller Quoted in Bloomberg Businessweek

    June 30, 2012

    Stephen Miller Quoted in Bloomberg Businessweek

    MORE


    Stephen Miller quoted in Bloomberg Businessweek

    September 21, 2011

    Stephen Miller quoted in Bloomberg Businessweek

    MORE


    Stephen Miller Quoted in Multiple Publications

    May 12, 2011

    Stephen Miller Quoted in Multiple Publications

    MORE


    Stephen Miller Quoted in Bloomberg News

    March 02, 2011

    Stephen Miller Quoted in Bloomberg News

    MORE


    Dow Jones Newswires Talks to Stephen A. Miller About Williamson v. Mazda

    February 24, 2011

    Dow Jones Newswires Talks to Stephen A. Miller About Williamson v. Mazda

    MORE


    Cozen O’Connor Adds Former Assistant U.S. Attorney, Supreme Court Clerk Stephen A. Miller

    September 27, 2010

    Cozen O’Connor Adds Former Assistant U.S. Attorney, Supreme Court Clerk Stephen A. Miller

    MORE

    Publications


    Supreme Court Willing to Reconsider Deference to Administrative Agencies [The Legal Intelligencer]

    April 24, 2013

    Most of the federal government's authority is exercised, on a day-to-day basis, through its administrative agencies. Central to the efficiency of those agencies — such as it is — is the judiciary's substantial deference to agency decision-making. Without that deference, people and corporations would often have an incentive to try to impair (or at least delay) agencies' actions through court challenges.

    MORE


    Re-examining Funding and the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine [The Legal Intelligencer]

    March 14, 2013

    Congress funds a variety of causes to the exclusion of others. That is permissible and necessary. Congress cannot, however, condition its spending on the abandonment of recipients' constitutional rights.

    MORE


    The Supreme Court Revisits the Takings Clause [The Legal Intelligencer]

    February 07, 2013

    The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari this term on two issues concerning the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause. The justices heard oral arguments January 15 on a case focused on the conditions that a land-use agency may attach when issuing a development permit.

    MORE


    Justices Take on Thorny Intellectual Property Cases [The Legal Intelligencer]

    January 10, 2013

    In the most recent Supreme Court term, justices heard oral arguments and granted certiorari on several cutting-edge questions of intellectual property law.

    MORE


    Supreme Court Considers Fourth Amendment Challenges [The Legal Intelligencer]

    December 19, 2012

    The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard arguments in a number of interesting Fourth Amendment cases. Of particular interest is a case questioning police use of drug-sniffing dogs to detect contraband in a defendant's home, and another case questioning whether police may detain an individual who has left a premises about to be searched pursuant to a valid warrant.

    MORE


    The Question Is Moot: Considering the Limits of Judicial Authority [The Legal Intelligencer]

    November 27, 2012

    In Jesse Jackson's famous Saturday Night Live sketch, every question was moot. Luckily for litigants, our courts take a more forgiving view. This term, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider questions relating to justiciability in a diverse array of cases touching upon national security, trademark law, the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Hague Convention. Each case turns on whether there is a "case" or "controversy," as required by Article III of the Constitution.

    MORE


    Doubling Down on Dukes: Expanding Upon 'Rigorous' Review [The Legal Intelligencer]

    October 23, 2012

    Two terms ago, in Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes, a 5-4 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court emphasized that class actions should be the "exception," not the rule, in federal litigation. In Dukes, the court held that a class of 1.5 million current and former employees of Wal-Mart failed to satisfy the "commonality" requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, and, therefore, could not bring a class action asserting their employment discrimination claims under Title VII.

    MORE


    Preview of the U.S. Supreme Court's Upcoming Term [The Legal Intelligencer]

    September 26, 2012

    Preview of the U.S. Supreme Court's Upcoming Term - The Legal Intelligencer - The Supreme Court will continue its recent trend of answering important questions in intellectual property litigation.

    MORE


    Justices Set to Revisit Affirmative Action for Universities [The Legal Intelligencer]

    March 20, 2012

    Justices Set to Revisit Affirmative Action for Universities - The Legal Intelligencer -

    MORE


    The 'Eyes' Have It at the U.S. Supreme Court [The Legal Intelligencer]

    January 24, 2012

    The 'Eyes' Have It at the U.S. Supreme Court - The Legal Intelligencer -

    MORE


    Blockbusters Loom as Supreme Court Term Begins [The Legal Intelligencer]

    October 19, 2011

    Blockbusters Loom as Supreme Court Term Begins - The Legal Intelligencer - It is surely tempting to summarize the Supreme Court's upcoming term in the voice of Charlie Brown's teacher: " Wah wah, wah wah wah wah , health care, wah wah wah wah , health care." The court's anticipated consideration of challenges to the Affordable Care Act would be momentous in any term; it becomes especially important when it occurs in the midst of the next presidential election.

    MORE


    Fall 2011 [Business Law Observer]

    October 01, 2011

    Fall 2011 - Business Law Observer - We welcome your inquiries on these topics and any other questions you may have, and trust that we can provide you with the counsel you need to steer clear of the impediments to successfully running your business.

    MORE


    PA Firms Making Midlevels Happier [The Legal Intelligencer]

    September 12, 2011

    PA Firms Making Midlevels Happier - The Legal Intelligencer - The bulk of Pennsylvania firms did a better job keeping their midlevel associates happy this year than they did last year, according to a survey by Legal affiliate The American Lawyer.

    MORE


    Standard of Review in Coverage Disputes Over Policies Governed by ERISA May Be Headed to Supreme Court [Insurance Coverage Alert!]

    July 11, 2011

    Standard of Review in Coverage Disputes Over Policies Governed by ERISA May Be Headed to Supreme Court - Insurance Coverage Alert! - Earlier this month, the 3rd Circuit took the minority side on an issue affecting life and health insurers that appears headed for the Supreme Court. In Viera v. Life Insurance Company of North America (June 10, 2011), the court held that an insurance company did not adequately communicate to policyholders that it retained broad-ranging authority to assess compliance under a group accidental death and dismemberment policy governed by ERISA.

    MORE


    Securities Plaintiffs Win Two Out of Three at Supreme Court [The Legal Intelligencer]

    June 21, 2011

    Securities Plaintiffs Win Two Out of Three at Supreme Court - The Legal Intelligencer - The U.S. Supreme Court issued three decisions in securities fraud cases this term. Plaintiffs' lawyers scored
    victories in the first two cases.

    MORE


    Supreme Court Decision Limits Scope of Private Securities-Fraud Actions [Securities Offerings and Regulation Alert!]

    June 13, 2011

    Supreme Court Decision Limits Scope of Private Securities-Fraud Actions - Securities Offerings and Regulation Alert! - This morning, the Supreme Court issued an important decision limiting the scope of private securities-fraud actions. The decision in Janus Capital Group, Inc., et al. v. First Derivative Traders (No. 09-525) will provide powerful protection to third-parties who assist issuers in the preparation of prospectuses and other public statements.

    MORE


    Global-Warming Litigation Gets Frosty Reception at the Supreme Court [The Legal Intelligencer]

    May 24, 2011

    Global-Warming Litigation Gets Frosty Reception at the Supreme Court - The Legal Intelligencer - It is often difficult to predict the outcome of Supreme Court cases. This is not because the individual justices are particularly fickle or inscrutable. The reason is quite simple: The cases that make it all the way to the Supreme Court are hard. The court does not usually intervene in a dispute unless at least two lower courts, each composed of smart jurists, answered the same legal question differently.

    MORE


    A 'CSI effect' for wiretapping? [The National Law Journal]

    May 10, 2011

    A 'CSI effect' for wiretapping? - The National Law Journal - The impact of the insider-trading prosecution of Raj Rajaratnam will be seismic. The verdict is significant, to be sure, but the prosecutors' method of assembling the evidence in the case will be the most lasting legacy — in particular, the use of wiretaps to prove criminal intent with devastating clarity.

    MORE


    Confronting Changes in Confrontation Clause Jurisprudence [The Legal Intelligencer]

    April 19, 2011

    Confronting Changes in Confrontation Clause Jurisprudence - The Legal Intelligencer - It is a little-known fact that statues of turtles rest at the bottom of several lampposts in the Supreme Court building. Architect Cass Gilbert's design of the building reportedly featured the turtle prominently because it symbolized the slow, deliberate pace of justice to be rendered by the court. For the most part, the analogy has held true.

    MORE


    Justices Poised to Clarify Standards of Proof in Intellectual Property Cases [The Legal Intelligencer]

    March 21, 2011

    Justices Poised to Clarify Standards of Proof in Intellectual Property Cases - The Legal Intelligencer - In the coming year, the Supreme Court is poised to overhaul the standards of proof in important areas of IP litigation. This may both hearten and frustrate longtime IP practitioners. At a very basic level, the attention is nice. Then again, it's worth remembering that IP is a sufficiently complicated field as to warrant its own, dedicated
    appellate court (the Federal Circuit). When the nine justices consider an IP issue, they do so as novices in that specialized domain,

    MORE


    ‘Bad Vehicles’ Could Cause Crash in Class Actions [The Legal Intelligencer]

    February 14, 2011

    ‘Bad Vehicles’ Could Cause Crash in Class Actions - The Legal Intelligencer - In U.S. Supreme Court parlance, a "bad vehicle" is a case whose factual or procedural posture exerts an adverse influence on the legal rule that the justices announce and apply. As we all know, the court does not issue legal rulings sua sponte. Rather, it can only decide specific cases selected from the pool of petitions seeking review at any given time.

    MORE


    U.S. Supreme Court Likely to Continue Robust Free Speech Protection [The Legal Intelligencer]

    January 10, 2011

    U.S. Supreme Court Likely to Continue Robust Free Speech Protection - The Legal Intelligencer - Each year, the Supreme Court considers several cases testing the contours of the First Amendment's protection of speech. The justices' enthusiasm for these cases should not be surprising. The free speech guarantee is a core element of our country's founding spirit and calls to protect dissident voices appeal to our visceral aversion to tyranny. In addition to those lofty principles, the underlying facts of

    MORE


    Three Supreme Court Cases to Test “Presumption Against Preemption” [The Legal Intelligencer]

    November 29, 2010

    Three Supreme Court Cases to Test “Presumption Against Preemption” - The Legal Intelligencer - The Supreme Court has recognized several species of preemption, though the
    categories tend to overlap. “Express” preemption occurs when Congress precludes state
    regulation in a particular area by announcing such an intention in the text of a statute.

    MORE

    Events & Seminars

    Association of Independent Colleges & Universities of Pennsylvania Annual Meeting Harrisburg, PA 04/15/2013
    Governance, Risk and Compliance - Back to Basics Philadelphia, PA 03/08/2013
    Politics and the Workplace: Best Practices for Employee and Corporate Political Activity Webinar 09/20/2012
    Hot Topics For Philadelphia Area In-house Attorneys Philadelphia, PA 10/25/2011
    Responding to Government Investigations: What to Do When the Government Comes Calling Philadelphia, PA 04/26/2011
    DELVACCA:New to In-House Symposium Philadelphia, PA 03/23/2011

    Practice Areas

    Internal Investigations & Criminal Defense

    Litigation

    Appellate

    Intellectual Property Litigation

    Industry Sectors

    Gaming

    Education

    • Northwestern University School of Law, J.D., 1997
    • Princeton University, A.B., 1993

    Bar Admissions

    • Pennsylvania
    • Illinois
    • Sitemap
    • Advanced Search
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Attorney Advertising