logo

Follow/Share
  • About
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Diversity
  • Alumni
  • English
    • 普通話

Contacts

Camille M. Miller

Co-Chair, Intellectual Property Group
P (215) 665-7273

Kerry B. McTigue

Co-Chair, Intellectual Property Group
P (202) 912-4810

Martin B. Pavane

Vice Chair, Intellectual Property Group
P (212) 883-4994

  • People
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • U
    • V
    • W
    • X
    • Y
    • Z
    • |
    • View all people



  • Industries
    • Energy & Utilities
    • Food & Beverage
    • Gaming
    • Health Care & Life Sciences
    • Insurance
    • Media, Entertainment & Sports
    • Real Estate & Construction
    • Technology
    • Transportation & Logistics
    • Venture Capital
  • Practice Areas
      • Antitrust & Trade Regulation
      • Bankruptcy, Insolvency & Restructuring
      • China Practice
      • Corporate
      • Emerging Business & Venture Capital
      • Energy, Environmental & Public Utilities
      • Health Care
      • International
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Private Client Services
      • Public & Project Finance
      • Securities
      • Tax
      • Transportation & Logistics
      Business/Corporate
      • Antitrust & Trade Regulation
      • Aviation
      • Consumer Protection & Privacy
      • Cozen O'Connor Public Strategies - Government Relations
      • Energy, Environmental & Public Utilities
      • Health Care
      • Privacy & Data Security
      • Transportation & Logistics
      Government & Regulatory
      • Bad Faith
      • Cyber/Technology
      • Insurance Corporate & Regulatory
      • Insurance Coverage & Claims Litigation
      • Professional Liability Insurance Coverage
      • Reinsurance
      • Subrogation & Recovery
      Insurance
      • Biologics/Biosimilars
      • Domains
      • e-commerce
      • Entertainment Law
      • Franchising
      • Hatch-Waxman Litigation
      • Intellectual Property Litigation
      • Licensing & Transfer
      • Patents
      • Right of Privacy & Right of Publicity
      • Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition
      • Trademark & Copyright
      Intellectual Property
      • Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
      • Employment Litigation
      • Immigration
      • Labor Relations & Disputes
      • Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition
      Labor & Employment
      • Antitrust Litigation & Investigations
      • Appellate
      • Aviation
      • Bankruptcy, Insolvency & Restructuring
      • Complex Litigation
      • Construction
      • Criminal Defense & Internal Investigations
      • Cyber/Technology
      • Electronic Discovery
      • Energy, Environmental & Public Utilities
      • Family Law
      • Franchise Disputes
      • Health Care
      • Insurance Coverage & Claims Litigation
      • Intellectual Property Litigation
      • Products Liability
      • Professional Liability
      • Real Estate Litigation
      • Securities Litigation & Enforcement
      • Self-insured Recovery
      • Transportation & Logistics Litigation
      Litigation
      • Brownfields Development
      • Distressed Real Estate
      • Eminent Domain
      • Office/Retail/Industrial Leasing & Development
      • Real Estate Finance
      • Real Estate Litigation
      • Zoning, Land Use & Development
      Real Estate
      • Subrogation & Recovery
    • Experience
      • Client Stories
      • Experience
    • Offices
      • Atlanta
      • New York
      • Charlotte
      • Philadelphia
      • Cherry Hill
      • San Diego
      • Chicago
      • Seattle
      • Dallas
      • Toronto
      • Denver
      • Washington, D.C.
      • Harrisburg
      • West Conshohocken
      • Houston
      • West Palm Beach
      • London
      • Wilkes-Barre
      • Los Angeles
      • Wilmington
      • Miami
    • News & Resources
      • Blogs
      • News & Resources
      • Media Resources
      • Publications
    • OVERVIEW
    • EXPERIENCE
    • PEOPLE
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • EVENTS
    • NEWS

      Intellectual Property

      Camille Miller Named a Client Choice 2013 Winner

      In today’s global economy, businesses must pay extremely close attention to protecting their intellectual property. Because IP lies at the heart of every product or service brought to market, it constitutes a corporation’s most valuable asset. A strong IP portfolio creates competitive advantage, captures market share, underwrites research and development, and promotes growth. Intellectual property is not pixels and megabits—it is human ingenuity made manifest. Cozen O’Connor’s IP team helps clients maximize the value of that ingenuity.

      Our intellectual property team represents a wide variety of national and international corporate clients from startups to multinational companies. Our clients operate in diverse industry sectors, including pharmaceutical, biotechnology, electronics, manufacturing, communications, finance, entertainment and education. We have a full-service practice, meaning we help clients acquire, manage, and protect intellectual property. We work in the areas of patent, trademark, trade dress, domain name and copyright – and regularly counsel on procurement, prosecution, enforcement, asset management, monetization, licensing, and litigation.

      As the value of intellectual property has multiplied over the last three decades, so have the costs of acquiring and protecting it. Well-managed companies no longer pursue acquisition or litigation without first carefully assessing the long-term viability of the underlying IP. It is our job to help clients make wise investments and direct resources toward those assets most likely to drive sustained growth. In order to provide this type of strategic counsel, the attorneys at Cozen O’Connor develop a deep understanding of each client’s overall business and how IP serves the client’s broader business goals.

      Our attorneys couple business acumen with prescient analysis of an ever-shifting legal and technological landscape. The rules governing intellectual property change constantly – and the underlying science and technology change even faster. We are active participants in the IP bar, so we know about legal developments as soon as they happen. And we have the scientific and technical background to handle the most complex IP matters. Cozen O’Connor operates on the cutting edge of law and science to help clients create IP portfolios that will retain value over the long term.

      While some law firms have attempted to corner niches in the IP marketplace, Cozen O’Connor believes clients are best served by attorneys who handle a wide range of IP issues,from patent enforcement to post-merger trademark consolidation, and who represent a wide range of clients, including plaintiffs, defendants, buyers, and sellers. Broad experience allows us to see each matter in a larger context and adopt approaches that support the health of an entire portfolio. It also gives us insight into the priorities of partners and adversaries; we have been on both sides, so we can accurately anticipate the actions and reactions of all constituents.

       

      SERVICES

      • Conduct patent procurement, freedom to operate, clearance, validity, and due diligence
      • Handle trademark and copyright prosecution, clearance, registrability, and due diligence
      • Lead patent, trademark, and copyright enforcement actions
      • Provide comprehensive portfolio management and counseling
      • Handled data privacy breaches
      • Negotiate licensing arrangements and strategies
      • Form partnerships, joint ventures, and outsourcing arrangements
      • Counsel clients regarding entertainment rights, right of publicity, and right of privacy
      • Develop online enforcement protocols, privacy policies, user and membership agreements
      • Represent clients with respect to trade secret, counterfeiting, and price discrimination issues
      • Conduct all forms of intellectual property litigation and dispute resolution

       

      CLIENTS

      We represent a diverse corporate client base, which includes everything from high-tech startups to renowned blue chips. Our clients operate in a wide range of industry sectors, including:

      • Automotive
      • Mining
      • Electronics and computer software
      • Telecommunications and internet service provision
      • Pharmaceutical
      • Biotech and chemical
      • Manufacturing and mechanical
      • Finance
      • Entertainment and sports
      • Food and beverage
      • Service and retail
      • Education and nonprofits

       

      TEAM

      The intellectual property team includes litigators, transactional lawyers, registered patent attorneys, and counselors. A significant number of our IP attorneys have degrees in key scientific fields such as chemistry, biology, electrical and mechanical engineering, and molecular biophysics. Many also have prior work experiences in technical fields, from software development to defense industry engineering, which gives them an in-depth understanding of client needs and goals. Members of the team regularly publish articles, lecture at institutions and universities, and appear in the legal and popular press. Given the global nature of the IP practice, we have attorneys who are fluent in Cantonese, Mandarin, French, and German.

      Intellectual property is a true hybrid of corporate law and litigation. Successful IP attorneys must be equally capable of negotiating complicated licensing agreements and cross-examining expert witnesses. Cozen O’Connor is ideally suited to operate at this legal crossroads because of its long-standing success as a business litigation firm. Our intellectual property attorneys are respected corporate practitioners and experienced trial attorneys. This gives our clients a distinct advantage in the conference room and in the courtroom.

      Experience

      Represented Metso Minerals, Inc., as plaintiff for patent infringement against Powerscreen Int’l. and Terex Corporation on a patent covering mobile screeners. The jury found, after a 7 week trial, that the patent was valid, enforceable and willfully infringed, and awarded damages of $15.8 million. The court doubled the damages to $31.6 million and issued a permanent injunction.


      Prior to trial, represented Sun Pharma as a defendant for infringement, by the FDA filing of a generic drug application, of a patent covering the drug pantoprazole. The preliminary injunction was denied.


      Represented Metso Paper, Inc., as plaintiff for patent infringement against Enerquin Air on a patent covering a blow box used on machines for making paper. After a favorable court decision construing the claims of the patent, the defendant settled on favorable terms.


      Served as lead trial counsel for Arora Board Review and various doctors in defense of claims of copyright infringement and breach of contract filed by the American Board of Internal Medicine.


      Served as lead trial counsel for Triumbari Corporation in a motion to intervene and a motion to set aside a consent decree filed by Bug Juice concerning product trade dress on a plastic bottle.


      Served as lead trial counsel for Oasys Mobile, Verizon Wireless, AT&T and Thumbplay in defense of a trademark infringement claim filed by Mantra Entertainment.


      Served as lead trial counsel for Beachbody, LLC in prosecuting a copyright and counterfeiting case adverse to Costco Wholesale Corporation.


      Served as lead trial counsel representing Jon Bon Jovi and the Philadelphia Soul Arena Football Team in prosecuting a trademark and copyright dispute.


      Served as lead trial counsel for Wilmington Trust Company in largest multidistrict patent litigation suit in defense of claims of patent infringement of RAKTL concerning call processing patents.


      Assisted in the IP due diligence of the $2.9 billion Altria Group, Inc. acquisition of John Middleton.


      Served as lead trial counsel for the estate of the author of the song “Disco Inferno,” where we succeeded in negotiating a settlement which confirmed the author's estate was the copyright owner in the renewal rights, could appoint their own administrator of such rights, and could collect licensing fees relating to such rights.


      Served as co-counsel representing National Association for Stock Car and Auto Racing, Inc., where NASCAR won a summary judgment leading to a ruling that NASCAR owns the worldwide copyrights to the NASCAR NEXTEL Cup Series Trophy. This ruling was upheld by the Third Circuit.


      Served as lead counsel for a cigar manufacturer, now owned by Altria, where we won a summary judgment motion on product trade dress protection for the appearance of a cigar which led to a favorable settlement in which the opposing cigar manufacturer agreed to phase out all use of the trade dress in question.


      Served as lead trial counsel for Celgene Corporation, a global biotechnology and pharmaceutical company, where we succeeded in obtaining a favorable settlement whereby a pharmaceutical company agreed to phase out all use of the term IMID.


      Defended our client in a preliminary injunction motion to its right to its name in a $10 million trademark infringement claim and convincing a judge that not enough evidence existed to create a trademark challenge when our client, a top video adventure game manufacturer, was sued by another top producer of video games.


      Represented Sandoz Inc. in King and Mutual v. Sandoz, 08-5974 (D.N.J.), in which Sandoz was alleged to infringe a patent concerning the muscle relaxant Skelaxin®. After an eight-day jury trial, the jury found the patent both invalid and not infringed. Both King and Mutual appealed, but then withdrew their appeal after Sandoz filed its appellate brief.


      In Aventis v. Dr. Reddy’s, three of Dr. Reddy’s generic fexofenadine products were alleged to infringe a total of seven patents, four patents directed to fexofenadine formulations and three patents directed to methods of treatment using fexofenadine. After a bench trial and with several summary judgment motions filed by Dr. Reddy’s pending, the plaintiff capitulated, providing Dr. Reddy’s with a no-strings-attached covenant not to sue with respect to all asserted patents.


      Designed and implemented the litigation strategy as counsel for the second generic challenger in a patent infringement case involving patentee's drug, TAMBACOR©, a heart medication with sales exceeding $150 million. Summary judgment of noninfringement was obtained in less than six months after patentee filed its complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. This judgment began tolling the 180-day exclusivity period of the first generic challenger, who was still facing trial and not yet on the market. The Federal Circuit subsequently affirmed the decision and, in doing so, expedited the client's market entry by many years. The Federal Circuit's decision resulted in a leading opinion on the proper application of the Hatch-Waxman Act, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Barr Labs.


      Designed and implemented the litigation strategy as lead counsel for the declaratory-judgment plaintiff, a generic drug maker, in a patent infringement case involving Sanofi-Aventis’ drug RILUTEK©, before the Honorable Judge Farnan in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. A preemptory declaratory judgment attack precluded patentee from relying on the statutory 30-month stay on approval, resulting in approval of the generic alternative only six months after the ANDA was filed. Impax Labs., Inc. v. Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


      Defended Chi Mei Optoelectronics in patent infringement litigation involving plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) processes used to make TFT-LCDs. Jury trial on liability found no willfulness and awarded plaintiff less than 5 percent of requested damages. Plasma Physics v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Display Corp., C.A. No. 08-1628 (E.D.N.Y).


      Defended InnoLux Display Corp. in patent infringement litigation involving plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) processes used to make TFT-LCDs. Case settled on terms the client found favorable. (E.D.N.Y.).


      Represented Wockhardt in ANDA litigation regarding LUNESTA®, the active ingredient of which is eszopiclone. Settled prior to trial on terms the client found favorable.


      Represented Vonage Inc. in defense of a patent case in a jury trial in federal court in Kansas.


      Represent relator in qui tam action involving patent false marking. Slack v. Bon Aqua International, (M.D.N.C.).


      Patent infringement action representing defendant Chi-Mei Optoelectronics (CMO) relating to modules for monitor and television displays. Received summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of CMO.


      Represented Fame Jeans Inc. in a trademark matter stemming from a TTAB action relating to mark for clothing. After heated discovery, prevailed on motion to dismiss one count from complaint. Subsequently negotiated multimillion-dollar settlement for Fame Jeans relating to mark.


      Represented Signalization Ver-Mac in declaratory judgment patent infringement relating to smart work zones on highways. Settled the case on terms the client found favorable after summary judgment motions were filed.


      Represented Vonage Holdings in a at jury trial of a patent infringement action relating to Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP). Settled the case on terms the client found favorable following trial.


      Represented NuVox in patent infringement action relating to Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP). Settled the case on terms the client found favorable following substantial discovery.


      Represented Peter Kiewit & Sons in patent infringement relating to fiber optic cable communications systems.Settled the case on terms the client found favorable following substantial discovery.


      Represented Chi Mei Optoelectronics in patent infringement action relating to modules for monitor and television displays.


      Represented CardSoft in a patent infringement action relating to point-of-sale devices. Granted Jury award in excess of $15.3 million.


      Represented relator in qui tam action involving patent false marking.


      Represented Chi-Mei Optoelectronics in a jury trial against a plaintiff who had received 42 licenses totaling $180-plus million in license royalties. Non-infringement found on 1 of 3 patents, reducing potential $900 million damages award to $10 million.


      Represented Signalization VerMac in declaratory judgment patent infringement action relating to solar tilt and rotate features of roadside message boards. Settled the case on terms the client found favorable after discovery.


      Represented Clark Capital Management Group, Inc. in filing dozens of federal lawsuits defending against unauthorized use of its NAVIGATOR marks. This is trademark infringement.


      Defended Bel Fuse in a patent infringement case on integrated modular connectors which was favorably settled.


      Represented Sultan Dental as accused infringer of dental fluoride foam patent. The patent was held invalid after jury trial.


      Represented Cumberland (Sweet'n Low) against Monsanto (Nutrsweet) in a trade dress case for the use of the color blue on sweetener packets . Lower court ruling in our favor was affirmed by the seventh circuit.


      Represented a German-based biotech company in a patent infringement action regarding a method for synthesizing nucleic acids.


      Patent infringement action regarding Apotex's ANDA to make a generic version of Sanofi-Aventis' anti-cancer product TAXOTERE®, the active ingredient of which is docetaxel. Following a two-week trial, obtained an order for Apotex striking down the patents-in-issue as invalid and unenforceable due to Sanofi-Adventis' inequitable conduct in procuring the patents.


      Served as lead counsel to well-known retailer of women's clothing in bringing cybersquatting claim under Lanham Act. Obtained summary judgment in client's favor, resulting in award of statutory damages, attorney fees, costs, sanctions and transfer of infringing domain name. Subsequently argued appeal in Fourth Circuit, obtaining affirmance on all grounds.


      Served as lead counsel to vacuum tube manufacturer in opposition proceeding in Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Obtained summary judgment in client's favor on issue of priority of use, resulting in dismissal of opposition and global settlement assigning worldwide marks to client.


      Represented Signalization Ver-Mac, in declaratory judgment patent infringement action relating to solar tilt and rotate features of roadside message boards. Settled the case on terms the client found favorable after discovery.


      Represented Vonage Holdings in a patent infringement action relating to Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP). Settled the case on terms the client found favorable following substantial discovery.


      Represented Lockheed Martin Corp. in opposing an effort by Zoltek Corp. to substitute it as a defendant in a patent-infringement action Zoltek had originally brought against the United States stemming from the U.S.'s alleged use of Zoltek's patent in the manufacture of the F-22 fighter plane. Obtained a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit allowing it to seek an interlocutory appeal of a Court of Federal Claim's decision that Lockheed was not protected by government-contractor immunity pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1498. Subsequent en banc Federal Circuit reversed trial court ruling thereby dismissing Lockheed Martin as a party.


      Represented defendant Wal-Mart Inc. on appeal to the Federal Circuit. Settled the case on terms the client found favorable just prior to oral argument.


      Represented our client, Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Medicis' acne product SOLODYN® (minocycline hydrochloride).


      Lead counsel for Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Endo's pain product OPANA® ER (oxymorphone hydrochloride).


      Represented Apotex Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Apotex's ANDA to make a generic version of Wyeth's anti-depressant product EFFEXOR XR® (venlafaxine hydrochloride). Settled on favorable terms during trial.


      Represented Apotex Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Apotex's ANDA to make a generic version of Sanofi-Aventis' anticancer product TAXOTERE®, the active ingredient of which is docetaxel. Following a two-week trial, obtained an order for Apotex striking down the patents-in-issue as invalid as obvious and unenforceable due to Sanofi-Aventis' inequitable conduct in procuring the patents. Successfully argued on appeal with the Federal Circuit affirming trial court decision (April 2012). Of import is that inequitable conduct defense remains viable in ANDA litigations because of this ruling.


      Handled a patent infringement action regarding Apotex's ANDA to make a generic version of Pfizer's migraine product Relpax®, the active ingredient of which is eletriptan hydrobromide.


      Represented Sandoz Inc. in a patent infringement action regarding Eon/Sandoz's abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) to make a generic version of Pfizer’s anti-seizure product Neurontin®, the active ingredient of which is gabapentin.


      Handled a patent infringement action regarding Schwarz Pharma’s ANDA to make a generic version of Braintree Labs’ constipation product Miralax®, the active ingredient of which is polyethylene glycol. During discovery, Braintree dismissed its infringement complaint, waiving the remaining portion of the 30 month stay on FDA approval of Schwarz Pharma’s product.


      Represented our client, Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Allergan's glaucoma drops COMBIGAN® (brimonidine tartrate/timolol maleate.)


      Represented our client, Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Alcon's eye allergy product PANTANOL® (olopatadine hydrochloride).


      Represented Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Merck's anti-nausea product EMEND® (aprepitant).


      Designed and implemented the litigation strategy as lead counsel for defendant, a Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturer, in a patent infringement case involving DC/AC power inverters for LCD panels in portable electronic devices. The defense resulted in a judgment as a matter of law on the issues of direct and contributory infringement and plaintiff's abandonment of a $120 million-plus damage claim (jury finding of inducement was reversed on appeal).


      Represented Chimei InnoLux Corporation, f/k/a InnoLux Display Corporation, in a patent infringement case involving brightness-enhancing films used in LCD devices. Plaintiff dismissed its case against our client, with prejudice, after the special master indicated he would recommend granting defendant's motion for summary judgment.


      Represented our client in a patent infringement action regarding Actavis' ANDA to make a generic version of King's pain product AVINZA®, the active ingredient of which is morphine sulfate.


      Represented our client, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Mylan's ANDA to make a generic version of Pfizer's cardiovascular product CADUET®, the active ingredients of which are atorvastatin calcium and amlodipine besylate. Settled prior to trial.


      Represented Apotex Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Apotex's ANDA to make a generic version of Procter's osteoporosis product ACTONEL® (risedronate).


      Represented our client, Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Abbott’s ZEMPLAR® (paricalcitol).


      Represented Apotex Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Apotex’s ANDA to make a generic version of LYSTEDA (tranexamic acid). Matter pending.


      Represented Apotex Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Apotex’s ANDA to make a generic version of ACULAR LS® (0.4% ketorolac tromethamine). Matter pending.


      Represented Apotex Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Apotex’s ANDA to make a generic version of PRISTIQ® (desvenlafaxine). Matter pending.


      Represented Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Shire’s ADHD product INTUNIV® (guanfacine hydrochloride). Matter pending.


      Represented Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz’s ANDA to make a generic version of Roche’s VALCYTE® (valganciclovir hydrochloride). Matter pending.


      Represented our client, Sandoz Inc., in patent infringement action regarding Sandoz’s ANDA to make a generic version of Helsinn’s anti-nausea product ALOXI® (palonosetron hydrochloride injection). Matter pending.


      Represented our client in a patent infringement action regarding InnoPharma’s ANDA to make a generic version of Spectrum’s FUSILEV® (levoleucovorin). Matter pending.


      Represented our client, Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz’s ANDA to make a generic version of Abbott’s cholesterol medication TRILIPIX® (fenofibric acid). Matter pending.


      Represented our client, Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz’s ANDA to make a generic version of Abbott’s cholesterol product NIASPAN® (niacin). Matter pending.


      Represented our client, Sandoz Inc., in a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Alcon's eye allergy product PATANOL® (olopatadine hydrochloride).


      Represented client CardSoft in patent infringement action against multiple defendants who manufactured and sold infringing electronic point-of-sale ("ePOS") terminals using “swipe-technology.” Successfully secured patent damages for client in excess of $15 million for CardSoft in jury trial against VeriFone Systems, Inc. and VeriFone, Inc. (VeriFone) and Hypercom Corp. (Hypercom).


      Lead counsel in damage phase of a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Pfizer’s seizure and neuropathic pain product, Neurontin®, the active ingredient of which is gabapentin.


      Handled a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Pfizer’s antifungal medication VFEND®, the active ingredient of which is voriconazole.


      Handled a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Pfizer’s antimuscarinic tablet Detrol and Detrol LA®, the active ingredient of which is tolterodine tartrate.


      Handled a patent infringement action regarding Sandoz's ANDA to make a generic version of Alcon's eye allergy product Pataday®, the active ingredient of which is olopatadine hydrochloride.


      Represented our client in a patent infringement action regarding Apotex’s ANDA to make a generic version of AVODART® (dutasteride). Matter pending.


      Attorneys

      David M. Albert Associate Philadelphia (215) 665-7277
      Joseph M. Bennett-Paris, Ph.D. Member Atlanta (404) 572-2024
      Ian R. Blum Member New York (212) 297-2679
      J. Trevor Cloak Associate Philadelphia (215) 665-4702
      W. Blake Coblentz Member Washington, D.C. (202) 912-4837
      Alphonso A. Collins Member New York (212) 297-2673
      Amy F. Divino Member New York (212) 883-4909
      Elizabeth Lai Featherman Member Philadelphia (215) 665-4603
      Lisa A. Ferrari Member New York (212) 297-2699
      Barry P. Golob Member Washington, D.C. (202) 912-4815
      Louis M. Heidelberger Member New York (212) 883.2221
      Michael J. Heller Chief Executive Officer Philadelphia (215) 665-4141
      Julia S. Kim Member New York (212) 883-4998
      Philip G. Kircher Member Philadelphia (215) 665-7233
      Philip Y. Kouyoumdjian Member New York (212) 883-4900
      Aaron Krauss Member Philadelphia (215) 665-4181
      Thomas Langer Member New York (212) 297-2662
      Lance J. Lieberman Member New York (212) 297-2697
      Aaron Lukas Associate Washington, D.C. (202) 912-4823
      Donald Robert McPhail Member Washington, D.C. (202) 912-4819
      Kerry B. McTigue Co-Chair, Intellectual Property Group Washington, D.C. (202) 912-4810
      Camille M. Miller Co-Chair, Intellectual Property Group Philadelphia (215) 665-7273
      Melanie A. Miller Member Philadelphia (215) 665-2714
      Darren S. Mogil Associate New York (212) 883-4976
      Alan J. Morrison Member New York (212) 297-2696
      Marilyn Neiman Member New York (212) 883-4985
      Andrew P. Nemiroff Member New York (212) 883-4906
      Martin B. Pavane Vice Chair, Intellectual Property Group New York (212) 883-4994
      Thomas C. Pontani Ph.D. Member New York (212) 883-4989
      Joseph W. Ragusa Of Counsel New York (212) 297-2691
      Martin G. Raskin Member New York (212) 883-4908
      Richard T. Ruzich Chair, ANDA & Biologics Practice Group Chicago (312) 382-3105
      Ian Scott Member New York (212) 908-1205
      Steven T. Shelton Member New York (212) 297-2674
      Brandon N. Sklar Of Counsel New York (212) 883-2220
      Chad O. Stouffer Associate Philadelphia (215) 665-2100
      Michael C. Stuart Member New York (212) 883-4992
      David B. Sunshine Member New York (212) 883-4911
      Kyle Vos Strache Associate Philadelphia (215) 665-2747
      Edward M. Weisz Member New York (212) 297-2660
      Justin B. Wineburgh Member Philadelphia (215) 665-2733
      Carl B. Wischhusen Of Counsel New York (212) 883-4967

      Publications


      Facebook v. Typosquatters: Statutory Damages Under Anticybersquatting Consumer

      May 14, 2013

      MORE


      Fifty Shades of Copyright [Intellectual Property Magazine]

      May 13, 2013

      MORE


      IP: Obamacare’s Constitutional Impact on Patents [InsideCounsel]

      April 30, 2013

      MORE


      IP: Supreme Court Holds That the “First Sale” Doctrine Applies to Copies of a Copyrighted Work Lawfully Made Abroad [InsideCounsel]

      April 16, 2013

      MORE


      IP: Compound Patents Take a Hit in Delaware District Court [Inside Counsel]

      March 19, 2013

      MORE


      IP: Protecting your brands against online counterfeit sellers [Inside Counsel]

      March 05, 2013

      MORE


      IP: 5 practice tips from the recent Rambus rulings [Inside Counsel]

      February 19, 2013

      MORE


      Health-Care Reform Creates Large-Dollar Biosimilar Drug Market [Chicago Daily Law Bulletin]

      November 08, 2012

      MORE


      Summer 2012 [Business Law Observer]

      July 01, 2012

      MORE


      Threats to Brands From Social Media [New York Law Journal]

      May 14, 2012

      MORE


      Supreme Court Prometheus Decision On Patent-Eligible Subject Matter [Intellectual Property Group Alert!]

      March 21, 2012

      MORE


      New Facts in Megaupload Case May Complicate Prosecution [Westlaw Journal Computer & Internet]

      February 22, 2012

      MORE


      The Stop Online Piracy Act and the High Seas of the Internet Age [The Legal Intelligencer]

      February 15, 2012

      MORE


      ICANN's New Generic Top-Level Domain Program Launches: What Brand Owners Need to Know [Intellectual Property Group Alert!]

      January 18, 2012

      MORE


      Creative Anti-Counterfeiting: Solutions for Combatting Counterfeiting Online [ACC Docket: The Journal of the Association of Corporate Counsel]

      November 01, 2011

      MORE


      How to Jump Ahead of the Backlog of Patents Awaiting Examination [The Legal Intelligencer]

      September 28, 2011

      MORE


      Summary of the Impending United States Patent Act – the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act [Intellectual Property Alert!]

      September 16, 2011

      MORE


      Protecting Your Inventions [MDT Medical Design Technology]

      July 07, 2011

      MORE


      Justices Poised to Clarify Standards of Proof in Intellectual Property Cases [The Legal Intelligencer]

      March 21, 2011

      MORE


      Patent Pools, Patent Misuse and Antitrust Rule of Reason Analysis [The Legal Intelligencer]

      November 02, 2010

      MORE


      Personalized URLs on Facebook [Intellectual Property Alert!]

      June 11, 2009

      MORE


      Avoiding Danger to Business Secrets in a Bad Economy [Law.com]

      January 09, 2009

      MORE


      A Survey of Damage Awards in Counterfeiting Cases [IP Litigator]

      December 01, 2008

      MORE


      License to Merge: Precautions for Preserving IP License Rights [Law Journal Newsletters: Entertainment Law and Finance]

      November 01, 2008

      MORE

      Events & Seminars

      Fundamentals of Patent Prosecution 2013: A Boot Camp for Claim Drafting & Amendment Writing New York, NY 06/12/2013
      Cybersecurity: Protecting Sensitive Information New York, NY 05/08/2013
      American Conference Institute Paragraph IV Disputes New York, NY 05/07/2013
      Columbia University Bioethics Course New York, NY 04/24/2013
      DELVACCA In-House Counsel Conference Philadelphia, PA 04/23/2013
      2013 BIO International Convention Chicago, IL 04/22/2013
      American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers 2013 Security Conference San Antonio, TX 04/15/2013
      8th Annual Corporate Intellectual Property Law Conference Chicago, IL 02/13/2013
      Protecting Biotechnology Inventions New York, NY 01/31/2013
      Paragraph IV Disputes San Francisco, CA 12/04/2012
      World Generic Medicines Congress Americas Washington, D.C. 11/27/2012
      4th Life Sciences Congress on Paragraph IV Disputes Washington, D.C. 10/25/2012
      Maximizing Pharmaceutical Patent Lifecycles New York, New York 10/10/2012
      2012 ITT Chicago-Kent Supreme Court IP Review (SCIPR) Chicago, IL 09/13/2012
      Licensing Agreements in 2012 LIVE Webcast Webcast 06/14/2012
      Fundamentals of Patent Prosecution 2012: A Boot Camp for Claim Drafting & Amendment Writing New York, New York 06/13/2012
      Prior Art, Obviousness, and the America Invents Act in 2012 New York, New York 06/04/2012
      Jefferies Patent Symposium New York, New York 05/30/2012
      International Trademark Association 134th Annual Meeting Washington D.C. 05/05/2012
      American Conference Institute's 6th Annual Paragraph IV Disputes New York, New York 04/24/2012
      DELVACCA Chapter 4th Annual In-House Counsel Conference Philadelphia, PA 04/16/2012
      Recent Changes to U.S. Patent Law Under The America Invents Act Beijing, China 04/09/2012
      Intellectual Property Law for the Biosciences Stony Brook, New York 02/02/2012
      Education Conference 2011 Philadelphia, PA 10/07/2011
      27th Annual Joint Patent Practice Seminar New York, NY 04/27/2011
      Drug Patent Settlements - Reverse Payments Camden, NJ 03/21/2011
      DELVACCA Chapter: Intellectual Property CLE Institute Philadelphia, PA 03/10/2011
      DELVACCA Presents: The Legal Hurdles of Building Brand Awareness Philadelphia, PA 03/24/2010
      “Legal-ease: Fair Use, Copyright and Content Aggregation Issues in the Digital Age,” Publishing Business Conference & Expo New York, NY 03/08/2010

      In The News


      Andrew Nemiroff Quoted in Law360 Article on Recent Federal Alarm Patent Case

      April 23, 2013

      MORE


      Kyle Vos Strache Quoted in The Legal Intelligencer on the America Invents Act

      March 15, 2013

      MORE


      Lance Lieberman Quoted in Multiple Outlets Regarding CBS Lawsuit against ABC

      May 29, 2012

      MORE


      David Sunshine quoted in Reuters

      March 20, 2012

      MORE


      Lance Lieberman quoted in The Washington Post, International Business Times and VentureBeat on Yahoo/Facebook litigation

      March 14, 2012

      MORE


      Michael Stuart quoted in Aggregates Manager Magazine

      February 16, 2012

      MORE


      Ed Weisz quoted in All Things Digital

      February 07, 2012

      MORE


      Scott Schwartz's Departure from Cozen O'Connor Featured in Philadelphia Business Journal

      January 17, 2012

      MORE


      Scott Schwartz quoted in The Globe and Mail

      November 30, 2011

      MORE


      Ed Weisz quoted in The Wall Street Journal

      November 14, 2011

      MORE


      Cozen O'Connor Intellectual Property Team in top 20 in the U.S. for trademark filings in 2010

      June 06, 2011

      MORE


      Scott Schwartz on Fox29 news

      March 07, 2011

      MORE

      Related Practice Areas

      Biologics/Biosimilars

      China Practice

      Domains

      e-commerce

      Emerging Business & Venture Capital

      Entertainment Law

      Franchising

      Hatch-Waxman Litigation

      Intellectual Property Litigation

      Licensing & Transfer

      Patents

      Right of Privacy & Right of Publicity

      Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition

      Trademark & Copyright

      • Sitemap
      • Advanced Search
      • Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Attorney Advertising