Cozen O’Connor: Case Study: Acticon V. China North East Petroleum [Law360]

Case Study: Acticon V. China North East Petroleum [Law360]

Jonathan Toren of the Global Insurance Department authored this article in Law30 discussing Acticon V. China North East Petroleum. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently held that even if a stock recovers its value after dropping following a corrective disclosure, a showing of loss causation is not necessarily negated at the pleading stage in a claim for securities fraud, in Acticon AG, et al. v. China North East Petroleum Holdings Ltd., et al., No. 11-4544-cv (2nd Cir., August 1, 2012).

To read the article, click here.


Related Attorneys

Jonathan Toren

Member

jtoren@cozen.com

(206) 224-1260


Related Practices


Related Industries