News & Events

Recent News & Publications

Search News & Publications

Tax Assessment Remanded for Findings [Tax Alert]

December 04, 2013

Publication - Tax

A panel of the Commonwealth Court reversed and remanded for further findings several assessments determined by a trial court. In re appeal of Harley-Davidson Motor Company, No. 159 C.D. 2013 (Pa Commw. Oct. 30, 2013). The property was approximately 229 acres formerly used for the manufacture of munitions and certain other industrial activities. The property had significant continuing environmental problems. The Commonwealth Court reversed for several reasons.


Drawing a Bright-line Rule on Discovery of Attorney-Expert Communications: Should All Work Product be Off Limits? [Civil Litigation Update]

December 01, 2013

Publication

Consider the following scenario: You have been retained in a personal injury case and your opponent has hired a medical expert to testify at trial. In response to a discovery request seeking materials from the expert’s file, your opponent turns over certain documents but withholds “letters and emails” exchanged with the expert. The basis for this nondisclosure is that the correspondence is protected “attorney work product.”


University’s Attorney-Client Privilege Survives Basketball Coach’s Disclosure [Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law]

November 27, 2013

Publication

In a whistleblower suit brought by a former athletic director, a New Jersey Appellate court recently held that a basketball coach’s disclosure to the NCAA of an email to the university’s counsel did not waive the university’s attorney-client privilege. See Hedden v. Kean University, No. A-4999-12T2 (N.J. App. Div. Oct. 24, 2013).


Are Surety Agreements Insurance? Federal Courts Weigh in [The Legal Intelligencer]

November 27, 2013

Publication

When is insurance not insurance? According to both Merriam-Webster and Black's Law Dictionary, insurance is a "contract whereby one party undertakes to indemnify or guarantee another against loss by a specified contingency or peril." Under that definition, "insurance" would include surety agreements, where one party agrees to indemnify another party if a third party defaults on a debt or fails to perform on a contract. But not so fast. A recent Pennsylvania federal court decision dismissed a bad-faith claim against a surety, finding that a surety bond is not "insurance" in Upper Pottsgrove Township v. International Fidelity Insurance, No. 13-1758 (E.D.Pa. Oct. 2, 2013).


Why Employers Shouldn't Ignore Workplace Bullying [The Legal Intelligencer]

November 27, 2013

Publication - Employment Litigation, Labor & Employment

Many associate bullying with kids and schools. State laws, educational awareness campaigns and all-too-frequent tragedies focus our attention on the problem of school bullying. Much less attention is paid to workplace bullying. In fact, in telling my school-age child that there are bullies at some workplaces, her response was: “There are no bullies at work. It is just people complaining.” This misconception is common, and unfortunately extends to many employers. As a result, many employers don’t see the need to take a proactive stance against workplace bullying. Even employers who acknowledge the prevalence of bullying in the workplace often see no need to act because currently there are no federal or state laws that expressly make workplace bullying illegal. This inaction, however, can translate into missed opportunities and increased costs.


High Profile Victory for Pro Player Funding LLC Highlighted in Law360

November 26, 2013

News

Alton Hall and Tammy Shea, members of Cozen O'Connor's Commercial Litigation Department, recently secured a summary judgment on behalf of Pro Player Funding LLC in the highly publicized case of Vincent Paul Young, Jr. v. Peoples Financial Services et al. The case involved a loan taken out by Vince Young, quarterback for the University of Texas during their 2005 National Championship season, third overall pick in the 2006 NFL draft, and 2006 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year.


Assessments Remanded for Findings Re: Obsolescence [Tax Alert]

November 26, 2013

Publication - Tax

A panel of the Commonwealth Court reversed and remanded assessments on a property regarding the impact of obsolescence on the buildings. In re Appeal of Council Rock School District, Appeal of LMC Properties, Inc., No. 354 C.D. 2013 (Pa Commw. Nov. 8, 2013) (unreported). The property consisted of 52 acres and an office, research and industrial center used for research and manufacturing. The court first rejected an argument that the trial court used a value-in-use methodology. The court held that the appraiser upon which the trial court relied did not take into account specialized equipment in the buildings.


Cozen O’Connor Continues Growth of International Subrogation and Recovery Department

November 25, 2013

News - Subrogation & Recovery - Insurance

Cozen O’Connor is pleased to announce the continued expansion of its internationally recognized Subrogation & Recovery Department with the recent addition of four attorneys. Lawyers who have joined the firm’s Subrogation & Recovery Department in 2013 include Virginia Markovich, member in the New York office; Philip J. Berens, an associate in Los Angeles; Richard J. Maleski, an associate in the Miami office; and Marie-Pier Nadeau, an associate in the Toronto office.


Washington Appellate Court Holds That Below-Limits Settlement Fails to Trigger Excess Policies [Global Insurance Alert]

November 25, 2013

Publication - Professional Liability Insurance Coverage - Insurance

On November 12, 2013, in Quellos Group LLC v. Federal Insurance Company, the Washington Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of two excess professional liability insurers because the excess policies “require[d] exhaustion of the underlying liability limits by actual payment by the insurer before excess coverage is triggered ...” even though the insured “filled the gap” by paying the difference between the value of the settlement with the primary carrier and the primary policy's limits. This holding represents the latest in a growing line of cases finding that an insured cannot settle with an underlying insurer for less than policy limits, absorb the difference between the settlement value and the limits, and then trigger excess coverage.


Liability for Marketing Claims in California [Cozen O’Connor Whitepaper]

November 25, 2013

Publication - Products Liability

Does a company expose itself to liability in California when it boasts that its products are the “safest in the business?” The answer will depend on whether courts will consider that statement to be a misleading claim or mere advertising puffery.


Ken Fisher Mentioned in Capital New York

November 25, 2013

News

Ken Fisher, of the New York City office and Real Estate Practice Group, was mentioned in a Capital New York article titled, "Controversial Magnate Pokes Holes in Bloomberg's Styrofoam Ban." The article explains the financed lobbying effort the City Council successfully pushed to alter Michael Bloomberg's bill to ban the use of styrofoam in food establishments.


Mind the Gap: Taking Steps to Bridge the Gap in Access to Civil Legal Services [The Pennsylvania Lawyer]

November 21, 2013

Publication

Every year millions of Americans attempt to navigate the legal system without the assistance of a lawyer. For a growing number of citizens, private counsel is unaffordable, free legal services are unavailable and they are forced to represent themselves in civil cases. In fact, each year less than 20 percent of low-income individuals with civil legal problems obtain legal assistance. Yet these legal issues involve the most basic rights that lawyers are sworn to protect, including cases involving but not limited to housing, health care, child custody and protection from abuse.


Potential benefits of cooperation with OFAC (Part 1) [InsideCounsel]

November 20, 2013

Publication - Antitrust & Competition, Government & Regulatory, White Collar Defense & Investigations

Recent settlements in civil enforcement proceedings brought by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) suggest that cover-ups, not crimes, may invite the stiffest penalties. Frequently, companies that cooperate with OFAC investigations, admit wrongdoing and take remedial actions to prevent future violations escape the enforcement process with mild punishments. Indeed, even companies that eventually cooperate after some initial resistance fare well in OFAC’s administrative enforcement process and often avoid criminal penalties altogether — penalties that, aside from the reputational damage, carry much more severe consequences, including prison time for individuals and massive financial impact.


Jennifer Brandt Appears on Happening Now on Fox News to Discuss New York Motocycle Gang Assault

November 20, 2013

News

Jennifer Brandt, a member of the firm’s Family Law practice, appeared on Happening Now on Fox News to discuss the arraignment of NYPD Detective Wojciech Braszczok, who was indicted as one of the bikers involved in the SUV-motorcyclist confrontation that happened on the West Side Highway in September.


Narrowing the Scope of Federal Discovery: The Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [Pennsylvania Bar Association Federal Practice Committee Newsletter]

November 15, 2013

Publication

According to some estimates, discovery costs account for between 50 and 90 percent of total litigation costs. Discovery also represents one of the major causes of delay and congestion in the judicial system. Indeed, in many ways, “[discovery] has become the focal point of litigation instead of means to an end.”


New ACA Developments Affecting Individual Coverage & Cancellations

November 15, 2013

News - Government & Regulatory, Health Care & Life Sciences - Health Care & Life Sciences

On November 14, President Obama announced that health insurers will be able to extend existing plans for individuals through 2014 that would have been otherwise cancelled due to changes under the Affordable Care Act. This proposed fix does not guarantee that extensions will be available, but rather allows insurers to offer the extension and for state regulators to approve it.


Justices Considering Jurisdiction Over Foreign Parties [The Legal Intelligencer]

November 14, 2013

Publication - Appellate

The jurisdiction cases reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court are rarely headline-grabbing. Nonetheless, those cases exert a significant effect on the civil litigation that fills the nation's dockets. This fall, the justices are considering two interesting cases from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that may limit the ability of federal courts to exercise jurisdiction over parties in foreign districts.


Washington Bars Insurers from Maintaining Legal Malpractice Suit Against Policyholder Defense Counsel [Global Insurance Alert]

November 14, 2013

Publication - Insurance Coverage, Professional Liability Insurance Coverage - Insurance

In Stewart Title Guar. Co. v. Sterling Savings Bank, et al., Wash. No. 87087-0 (October 3, 2013), the Washington Supreme Court held that a nonclient insurer may not pursue a malpractice claim against appointed defense counsel for failure to assert defenses favorable to the insurer, unless the insurer could show it was an intended beneficiary of the legal services provided by appointed defense counsel. The court reasoned that neither an alignment of interest between an insurer and policyholder nor appointed counsel’s duty to inform the carrier regarding case activity, equated to a duty of care owed by appointed defense counsel to the appointing insurer. The court declined to reach the parties’ equitable subrogation arguments that formed the basis of the actual legal malpractice claim.


David Barron Offers Office Party Advice in BenefitsPro

November 14, 2013

News - Employment Litigation, Labor & Employment

In an article titled ''Oh no, not the office party again!'' David Barron, a member of Cozen O'Connor's Labor & Employment Department, offers advice on how to limit the potential fallout from an office party gone horribly wrong.


Electricity Not a Good for Administrative Priority Claims [Delaware Business Court Insider]

November 13, 2013

Publication - Bankruptcy, Insolvency & Restructuring

Is electricity a good for purposes of establishing an administrative priority claim under Section 503(b)(9) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code? That is the question that U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Sontchi of the District of Delaware answers in In re NE Opco, Case No. 13-11483 (CSS) (Bankr. D. Del. Nov. 1, 2013). Faced with a split in authority from other jurisdictions and no written opinions on the subject in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Sontchi, in a fascinating opinion, holds that electricity is not a good for purposes of Section 503(b)(9).

Page 369 of 459

Previous Next