Matthew A. Glazer

Member

Matt handles a wide variety of complex commercial litigation in state and federal courts — including real estate, construction, toxic tort, gaming, product liability and breach of contract matters — and has successfully tried hundreds of cases, both civil and criminal. He is frequently called upon to handle significant, high profile, and high exposure cases for some of the largest private and public companies in the country. Additionally, his prosecution background allows him to provide both trial representation and valuable guidance to individuals and corporations who are subjects of government investigations. While Matt has significant experience leading cases through verdict in Pennsylvania courts, he has also been retained to handle cases in Connecticut, Indiana, New York, California, Arizona, Illinois, Georgia, Utah, Nevada, Ohio, Florida, South Carolina, and Virginia.

Matt has extensive first chair experience representing defendants and plaintiffs in court and in arbitrations. He has successfully prosecuted multiple million- dollar verdicts and judgments and has also defeated significant claims brought against his clients before juries and in arbitrations. Matt regularly handles injunction matters and has successfully litigated those matters in both trial and appellate courts.

He regularly represents owners, developers, contractors, and design professionals in all phases of the dispute resolution process in construction matters. Matt has litigated significant construction claims from the owner, developer, contractor, and design professional perspectives, with significant experience in court and arbitration.

Matt has extensive experience helping companies and individuals navigate government investigations, implement compliance programs, and defend against criminal charges. He has represented a diverse range of clients, including large health care service providers, financial institutions, manufacturers, tech companies, and corporate directors and executives.

He maintains an active pro bono practice and has represented two clients who were released from prison after serving 38 years and 25 years, respectively, for crimes that they did not commit. Currently, Matt serves as a trustee of the Philadelphia Bar Foundation and has previously served for many years on the board of another legal services nonprofit in Philadelphia.

Matt earned his bachelor’s degree from Tufts University with a double major in international relations and Spanish. He received his law degree from Temple University Beasley School of Law where he was an editor of the Temple International & Comparative Law Journal. Matt was also the recipient of the Harry R. Kozart Memorial Prize Fund Award.

test

Experience

News

Matt Glazer Quoted in Press Enterprise Coverage of Bloomsburg Raceway Litigation

November 20, 2025

Matt Glazer was featured in a Press Enterprise article covering litigation between the Town of Bloomsburg and the Bloomsburg Fair regarding auto racing at Bloomsburg Raceway, where he questioned town officials about the municipality's actions leading up to the dispute.

Matt Glazer Quoted in Philadelphia Inquirer Coverage of SEPTA Service Cuts Litigation

September 04, 2025

Matt Glazer was quoted in a Philadelphia Inquirer article covering litigation over SEPTA's service reductions, where he defended the transit agency's actions amid a significant budget shortfall and ongoing funding uncertainty.

Cozen O'Connor Names 11 New Shareholders

September 12, 2022

Cozen O’Connor is pleased to announce the promotion of 11 members to shareholders.

Cozen O’Connor Pro Bono Team Secure James Dennis's Release After 25 years in Prison

January 20, 2017

Stephen Cozen and Matt Glazer, with assists from Harper Seldin and Coleen Williams, devised a strategy that led to a deal that will likely have Dennis out in a few weeks.

Bob Hayes and Matthew Glazer in Law360 Regarding Successful Representation of Comcast Spectacor

July 30, 2014

A Pennsylvania federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit in which two sports industry veterans sought a $2 million finder's fee from Comcast Spectacor LP, the former owner of the Philadelphia 76ers, stemming from the 2011 sale of the franchise. U.S. District Judge Petrese Tucker ruled that under the agreement Bob Whitsitt — a former owner of the Seattle Seahawks and Portland Trailblazers — and Thomas Shine signed with Comcast Spectacor, the pair were obligated to identify the proposed purchaser to the team in order to collect their fee.

Publications

Subrogation Lawyer Helps with Arson Exoneration [Subrogation & Recovery Law Blog]

February 12, 2024

Cozen O’Connor’s Subrogation attorney Larry Walker assisted on the team of other Cozen lawyers (Matt Glazer and Chase Howard), along with the Pennsylvania Innocence Project, to secure the exoneration and release of a man wrongfully convicted of arson. 

First Amendment Under Arrest: Photographing Police in Public Places at Issue on Multiple Fronts [Villanova Law Review]

July 17, 2016

Tom Wilkinson and Matthew Glazer, both members of Cozen O'Connor's Commercial Litigation department, discuss photographing police in public places in the Villanova Law Review.

A Primer on Joint-Defense Agreements [The Legal Intelligencer]

May 05, 2015

Matthew Glazer and Arthur Fritzinger explain that even the most routine corporate investigation has the potential to develop into a multidefendant case, and it may be important for parties to coordinate their strategies from the beginning through joint-defense agreements.

Potential benefits of cooperation with OFAC (Part 3) [InsideCounsel]

January 22, 2014

OFAC does not deal only with cooperating entities, of course. On one hand, non-cooperating entities certainly run a risk that OFAC will refer their violations to criminal authorities. But even a non-cooperator can receive benefits, even grudgingly, under OFAC’s administrative-penalty regime — especially compared to companies that become targets of criminal prosecution and the severe penalties attendant to that process. That comparison between administrative and criminal punishments of non-cooperating entities, as discussed infra, may yield useful, persuasive data to criminal defense lawyers representing an entity under criminal investigation.

Potential benefits of cooperation with OFAC (Part 2) [InsideCounsel]

December 23, 2013

As the formulas from Part 1 demonstrate, OFAC’s regulations strongly incentivize cooperation to reduce a violator’s penalty. The next section examines a few recent enforcement actions in which companies have taken advantage of these regulatory formulas to minimize penalties resulting from violations.

Events & Seminars

Past Events

Judicial Affairs: Restorative Justice

March 04, 2016 - Philadelphia, PA

Who's Accountable to Whom?

November 13, 2015 - Mechanicsburg, PA

Education

  • Temple University—James E. Beasley School of Law, J.D., 2006
  • Tufts University, B.A., 2000

Awards & Honors

Thomas Reuters, Stand-Out Lawyer, 2026

  • New Jersey
  • Pennsylvania
  • U.S. District Court -- New Jersey